• Claudio Sandroni, Giorgia Ferro, Susanna Santangelo, Francesca Tortora, Lorenza Mistura, Fabio Cavallaro, Anselmo Caricato, and Massimo Antonelli.
• Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Catholic University School of Medicine, Largo Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy.
• Resuscitation. 2004 Sep 1; 62 (3): 291-7.

ObjectivesTo evaluate the factors affecting the outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest.SettingA 1400-bed tertiary care teaching hospital with a dedicated cardiac arrest team (CAT). The CAT was immediately available in monitored areas (intensive care unit and emergency room). In the wards the staff had only BLS skills and automated external defibrillation was not available.MethodsA 2-year prospective audit according to the Utstein style.ResultsA total of 114 cardiac arrests (37 with VF/VT and 77 with non-VF/VT) were included. Fifty-two cardiac arrests (46%) occurred in monitored areas, 62 (54%) occurred in non-monitored areas. The CAT arrival time in non-monitored areas was 3.98+/-1.73 min. Thirty-seven patients (32%) survived to hospital discharge. Cardiac arrests occurring in monitored areas had a significantly better outcome than those occurring in the wards. Patient survival in the wards was significantly higher when the CAT arrival time was less than 3 min. No patient whose CAT arrival time was longer than 6 min survived. CAT arrival time was significantly shorter (1.30+/-1.70) in survivors than in non-survivors (2.51+/-2.37; P<0.005). Sex, age and presence of bystanders were not significantly associated with survival.ConclusionsIn our setting, where bystander defibrillation was not available, the survival of patients having cardiac arrest in non-monitored areas strongly depends on advanced life support provided by the CAT. A faster CAT response and early defibrillation from the ward staff are the most important improvements necessary to increase cardiac arrest survival in our setting.

35 keywords...

hide…