-
Review Meta Analysis Comparative Study
Meta-analysis of joint preservation versus arthroplasty for the treatment of displaced 3- and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus.
- M Mustafa Gomberawalla, Bruce S Miller, Robert M Coale, Asheesh Bedi, and Joel J Gagnier.
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: mgombera@gmail.com.
- Injury. 2013 Nov 1;44(11):1532-9.
PurposeThis meta-analysis compares the clinical outcomes of joint preservation versus arthroplasty in the treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures.MethodsMedline, CINAHL, and EMBASE were searched for studies published between 1970 and 2011 reporting outcomes of the treatment of 3- or 4-part proximal humerus fractures using the Constant-Murley score in skeletally mature patients. Randomised and cohort studies with ≥ 1-year follow-up were included. Two individuals independently extracted data, and study results were divided into subgroups based on type of treatment.ResultsA meta-analysis with meta regressions was performed on the mean Constant score. Of 610 total participants in the studies analysed, 340 were treated with joint-preserving techniques. The random-effects mean Constant score across all treatment types was 62.7 (95% CI, 61.6-63.9, P<0.001), with joint-preserving treatments demonstrating higher scores than arthroplasty (70 vs. 49, P<0.001). The studies displayed significant heterogeneity (Q statistic=516, P<0.001, I(2)=94.8). In the meta-regression analyses, Constant scores decreased significantly with increasing age, fracture severity, and rate of osteonecrosis (P<0.001).ConclusionsIn the existing literature, displaced proximal humerus fractures demonstrate improved Constant scores when treated with joint-preserving options. Age, fracture pattern, and complication rate are significant predictors of the Constant score independent of the selected treatment. Given the observed heterogeneity and variance in treatment techniques in the included studies, more comparative studies are needed to definitively recommend joint-preserving techniques versus arthroplasty for specific fracture patterns.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.