• J Nutr Health Aging · Jun 2010

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Improved nutrient intake in older obese adults undergoing a structured diet and exercise intentional weight loss program.

    • G D Miller.
    • Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109-7868, USA. millergd@wfu.edu
    • J Nutr Health Aging. 2010 Jun 1;14(6):461-6.

    ObjectivesPhysicians are often reluctant to advise older obese patients to lose weight for fear of compromised nutrition and excessive loss of muscle mass and strength, all of which may lead to a loss of independence and accelerate disability. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine nutrient intake in older obese adults undergoing a weight loss intervention.SettingThe study setting was at a university research facility.ParticipantsA total of 71 participants (age, 69.5 (SD = 5.8) yrs; 62% female; BMI, 34.6 (4.4) kg/m2) were recruited.DesignIndividuals were randomized into either a weight stable (WS) control group or an intensive weight loss (WL) group.InterventionThe WL intervention was for 6 months and utilized partial meal replacements (PMR) and a facility-based 3 d/wk, 60 min/session exercise training program encompassing both aerobic and strength exercises. Weight loss goal for WL was 10% from baseline at 6-months.MeasurementsVariables were obtained at baseline and 6-months and included 3 day dietary records along with daily step counts for 7 days. Total energy, macronutrients (g and % of energy), micronutrients (vitamins and minerals), as well as use of PMR were assessed from the diet records. Body mass and body fat (g and % of body mass) were determined at the 2 time points.ResultsEstimated marginal means (SEM) for weight loss at 6-months was -8.8 (0.7)% for WL and -0.1 (0.7)% for WS. Daily energy intake at 6-months was lower for WL (1396 (64) kcals) compared to WS (1817 (71) kcals). Additionally, those in the WL group (compared to WS) had lower intakes of total fat (27.5 (1.2)%, WL vs. 36.1 (4.6)%, WS) and saturated fatty acids (8.5 (0.4)% vs. 10.8 (0.5)%), and had higher levels of carbohydrates (57.6 (1.5)% vs. 49.0 (1.7)%), protein (18.4 (0.5% vs. 16.2 (0.6)%), and dietary fiber (21.0 (0.9) g vs. 17.4 (1.0) g) at 6-months. Even with reduced total calorie intake, key micronutrients (calcium, iron, vitamin D, vitamin E, vitamin C) were higher for WL vs. WS at 6-months. Total daily step counts were higher for WL vs. WS at 6-months.ConclusionA nutrition intervention to promote weight loss in older obese adults was achieved using PMR as a primary strategy. Diet quality was improved for WL vs. WS in using the nutrient fortified product, even with a reduction in total energy intake.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.