-
Comparative Study
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Neck Disability Index and Neck Pain and Disability Scale.
- Chad Cook, Jan K Richardson, Larissa Braga, Andreia Menezes, Xavier Soler, Paulo Kume, Marcelo Zaninelli, Fernanda Socolows, and Ricardo Pietrobon.
- Division of Physical Therapy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. chad.cook@duke.edu
- Spine. 2006 Jun 15;31(14):1621-7.
Study DesignThis study's design was a cross-cultural validation of the Neck Disability Index and Neck Pain and Disability Scale.ObjectivesThis study's objective was to translate, culturally adapt, and validate a Brazilian Portuguese version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI-BR) and the Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS-BR).Summary Of Background DataAlthough several valid measures exist for measurement of neck pain and functional impairment, these measures have yet been validated in Brazilian Portuguese. Successful linguistic and cultural translation may allow appropriate cross-cultural comparison for clinical and laboratory research analysis.MethodsThe NDI-BR and NPAD-BR were culturally and linguistically translated from English into Brazilian Portuguese. The translated version of the instrument was administered to 203 patients at a midsize hospital in southern Brazil. Psychometric evaluation included factor analysis, internal reliability measures, test-retest reliability at 1 and 7 days, and criterion validity comparison with the Brazilian version of the SF-36.ResultsFactor analyses demonstrated a single-factor subscale for the NDI-BR and three subscales for the NPDS-BR. An item analysis showed a high degree of internal consistency for the NDI-BR (r = 0.74) and the three subscales of the NPDS-BR (subscale 1, r = 0.89; subscale 2, r = 0.81; subscale 3, r = 0.72). Test-retest reliability was also acceptable at for the NDI-BR (0.98 at baseline and 0.48 at 7 days) and subset one (0.96 at baseline and 0.91 at 7 days), subset 2 (0.96 at baseline and 0.62 at 7 days), and subset 3 (0.52 at baseline and 0.45 at 7 days) of the NPDS-BR. Construct validity was established during comparison of the Brazilian version of the SF-36. Only items associated with physical role, bodily pain, and emotional role failed significant correlation.ConclusionsA reliable and valid Portuguese version of the Neck Disability Index and Neck Pain and DisabilityScale was developed, which will facilitate the examination of functional performance within a large patient population, as well as cross-cultural comparisons.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.