• Keri S Taylor and Karen D Davis.
• Division of Brain, Imaging and Behaviour - Systems Neuroscience, Toronto Western Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
• Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Jul 1;30(7):1947-62.

AbstractFunctional MRI can be used to assess brain plasticity over time. To confidently attribute changes in activation patterns to cortical plasticity, it is important to establish the stability of cortical activation patterns. Because little is known concerning the stability of somatosensory-evoked brain responses, we assessed the reproducibility of within-subject responses in key somatosensory regions [thalamus, primary and secondary cortex (S1, S2)] to tactile and painful stimuli using threshold-dependent and threshold-independent analyses. Six subjects underwent four biweekly scanning sessions during which tactile and painful stimuli were applied to the hand. Standard thresholding and voxel counting techniques were compared with a novel threshold-independent method utilizing percent signal change within the regions of interest. Contralateral S1 and S2 were qualitatively reproducible during tactile stimulation, with overlapping activations >85% of the time. S2 was also highly reproducible during painful stimulation (88%), whereas S1 was less reproducible (44%). However, activation in the thalamus to both tactile and painful stimulation was highly variable. Ipsilateral activation was consistent within S2 but sparse within S1 and thalamus. Deactivations within ipsilateral S1 occurred 48% of the time with tactile stimuli, and 90% of the time with painful stimuli. Within contralaterally activated regions intraclass correlations (ICCs) were very high using the unthresholded method regardless of the type of stimulation, whereas much lower ICCs arose from the thresholded analyses. These data indicate that a threshold-independent analysis can produce more reproducible outcomes than a standard threshold-dependent analysis.Copyright 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc

29 keywords...

hide…