• Paul P Walker and Peter M A Calverley.
• Division of Infection and Immunity, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom. ppwalker@liv.ac.uk
• COPD. 2008 Jun 1;5(3):147-52.

AbstractA significant proportion of patients with COPD show post-bronchodilator improvement in lung volume even though this response is rarely considered when classifying subjects as having reversible or irreversible airway disease. We studied 266 patients with a clinical and physiological diagnosis of COPD who underwent pulmonary function testing and had their spirometric response to 5 mg salbutamol assessed. After the bronchodilator 125 (47%) patients increased their forced vital capacity by more than the known variability of the test while 60 (23%) showed only a volume response without improvement in expiratory flow. These 'volume responders' had greater degrees of airflow obstruction-lower FEV(1) (p < 0.001) and FEV(1)/FVC (p < 0.05)-and a higher residual volume at rest (p = 0.005) with similar degrees of emphysema measured by K(CO). Subjects with evidence of greater dynamic airway collapse, assessed by the ratio of early to mid expiratory flow, were less likely to have a flow response but more likely to have a volume response after salbutamol (p < 0.005). This would be compatible with volume response being commoner in patients who exhibit tidal expiratory flow limitation. We suggest that post-bronchodilator absolute change in FVC provides important additional physiological information when interpreting bronchodilator reversibility testing.

23 keywords...

hide…