• Clinical therapeutics · Jul 2004

    Assessing satisfaction with pain medication in primary care patients: development and psychometric validation of a new measure.

    • Eva Baró, Alfonso Casado, Carles García-Cases, Luis Clerch, and Salvador Ribas.
    • Health Outcomes Research Department, 3D Health Research, 08013 Barcelona, Spain. ebaro@3d-healthresearch.com
    • Clin Ther. 2004 Jul 1;26(7):1124-36.

    BackgroundThe measurement of patient satisfaction with pain medication (SPM) is a potentially useful aid for health care decision-making, but no validated measures for SPM are known.ObjectiveThis study aimed to develop an instrument to assess this patient-reported outcome in primary care and to evaluate whether it satisfactorily fulfilled the required psychometric properties (ie, reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change).MethodsThe measure's content was obtained from literature reviews, focus groups, and expert opinion. A preliminary version of 14 self-administered items was obtained and tested in a prospective study in patients receiving pain medication. Item-total statistics and factor analysis were performed to obtain the final version. The final version was psychometrically validated by assessing feasibility, internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), convergent validity (multivariant methods), discriminant validity in patients presenting pain relief (receiver operating characteristic curves), test-retest reliability (using the intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] in patients maintaining medication), and sensitivity to change (in patients changing medication).ResultsA total of 1119 patients were recruited (626 women [55.9%]; mean [SD] age, 47.6 [15.36] years; primarily suffering musculoskeletal injury [50.7%]). Four items were deleted from the preliminary version owing to low item-scale correlation and/or factor loadings. The final factor analysis confirmed a 4-factor solution, which explained 81.4% of the variance in questionnaire scores. Adverse events, speed/duration of effect, functional benefit, and overall satisfaction dimensions were identified. Cronbach's alpha and ICC for the 10-item final version were >0.80 for the summary score and all dimensions. Pain-related characteristics (intensity, frequency, and degree of pain relief), but not patient-related characteristics, were independently associated with the summary score. The area under the curve was 0.78 for the summary score. Effect sizes and standardized response mean were > or = 0.84 for the summary score and all dimensions.ConclusionThe SPM questionnaire appears to have good acceptability as well as satisfactory psychometric properties, based on these analyses.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.