• J Kevric, G M O'Reilly, R A Gocentas, O Hasip, C Pilgrim, and B Mitra.
• Trauma Service, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. kevricj@gmail.com.
• Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016 Dec 1; 42 (6): 671-675.

IntroductionThe management of haemodynamically stable patients who present following a penetrating abdominal injury (PAI) remains variable between mandatory surgical exploration and more selective non-operative approaches. The primary aim of this study was to assess compliance with an algorithm guiding selective non-operative management of haemodynamically stable patients with PAI. The secondary aim was to examine the association between compliance and unnecessary laparotomies.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study involving all patients with PAI that presented to a major trauma centre from January 2007 to December 2011. Data were extracted from the trauma registry and patients' electronic medical records.ResultsThere were 189 patients included in the study, of which 79 (41.8 %) patients complied with the algorithm. The laparotomy rate in the setting of algorithm compliance was significantly lower than algorithm non-compliance (12.7 vs. 68.2 %; p < 0.01) as were unnecessary laparotomy rates (0 vs. 33.3 %; p = 0.03).ConclusionAmong haemodynamically stable patients presenting with PAI, compliance with an algorithm guiding selective non-operative management was low, but associated with lower laparotomy and lower unnecessary laparotomy rates. Improved compliance with algorithms directed towards selective non-operative management of PAI should be encouraged with stringent vigilance towards patient safety.

20 keywords...

hide…