-
Critical care medicine · May 1996
Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical TrialVolume-controlled versus biphasic positive airway pressure ventilation in leukopenic patients with severe respiratory failure.
- M Kiehl, C Schiele, W Stenzinger, and J Kienast.
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Muenster, Germany.
- Crit. Care Med. 1996 May 1;24(5):780-4.
ObjectiveTo study comparatively the effects of volume-controlled vs. biphasic positive airway pressure mechanical ventilation on respiratory mechanics and oxygenation in leukopenic patients with severe respiratory failure.DesignProspective, comparative study.SettingMedical intensive care unit of a university hospital.PatientsLeukopenic (<1000 leukocytes/microliter) patients (n=20) after cytoreductive chemotherapy requiring mechanical ventilation for severe respiratory failure (Murray score of > 2.5).InterventionPatients were assigned in a consecutive, alternating manner to receive either volume-controlled or biphasic positive airway pressure mechanical ventilation, starting within 12 to 24 hrs after endotracheal intubation.Measurements And Main ResultsTidal volume, inspiratory flow, peak inspiratory and positive end-expiratory pressures, FIO2, and arterial blood gas analyses were recorded hourly for a study period of 48 hrs. Biphasic positive airway pressure ventilation was associated with a significant reduction in peak inspiratory pressure (mean differences at 24, 36, and 48 hrs: 4.4, 3.4, and 4.2 cm H2O; p = .024, .019, and .013, respectively) and positive end-expiratory pressures (mean differences at 24, 36, and 48 hrs: 1.6, 1.4, and 1.5 cm H20; p = .023, .024, and .023, respectively) at significantly lower FIO2 (mean differences at 12, 24, 36, and 48 hrs; p = .007, .015, .016, and .011, respectively). PaO2/FIO2 ratios and CO2 removal were similar under ventilatory conditions.ConclusionsBiphasic positive airway pressure ventilation offers the advantage of significantly reduced peak inspiratory and positive end-expiratory pressures at a lower FIO2 and with at least similar oxygenation and CO2 removal as achieved by volume-controlled mechanical ventilation. Our results are in line with previous reports on nonleukopenic patients and suggest that the positive effects of pressure-limited mechanical ventilation are independent of circulating white blood cells. Further studies are mandatory to demonstrate clinical benefit in this critically ill patient population.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.