• Gerben DeJong, Ching-Hui Hsieh, Julie Gassaway, Susan D Horn, Randall J Smout, Koen Putman, Roberta James, Michael Brown, Elizabeth M Newman, and Mary P Foley.
• Center for Post-acute Studies, National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC 20010, USA. Gerben.DeJong@MedStar.net
• Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Aug 1;90(8):1269-83.

ObjectiveTo characterize rehabilitation services for patients with knee and hip replacement in 3 types of postacute facilities in the U.S.DesignMulti-site prospective observational cohort study.SettingEight freestanding skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), 1 hospital-based SNF, and 11 inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs).ParticipantsPatients (N=2158) with knee or hip replacement.InterventionsNo new interventions.Main Outcome MeasuresLength of stay (LOS), amount and intensity of physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT), types of therapy activities.ResultsAverage LOS was about 15 days for freestanding SNF patients, and 9 to 10 days for hospital-based SNF and IRF patients. Freestanding SNFs and IRFs provide about the same number of hours of PT and OT; the hospital-based SNF provided 27% fewer hours. Freestanding SNFs and the hospital-based SNF provided fewer hours a day than did IRFs. Joint replacement patients across all 3 types of facilities spent, on average, 70% to 75% of their PT time in just 2 activities--exercise and gait and spent 56% to 66% of their OT time in 3 activities--exercise, functional mobility, and dressing lower body.ConclusionsBoth freestanding SNFs and IRFs provided similar amounts of PT with a similar emphasis on exercise and gait activities. IRFs, however, provided more OT than freestanding SNFs. IRFs had shorter LOSs and more intensive therapy services than freestanding SNFs. Study freestanding SNFs exhibited greater variation in LOS and intensity of therapy than IRFs.

21 keywords...

hide…