• S Rubertsson, T Karlsson, and L Wiklund.
• Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden.
• Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998 Jan 1;42(1):32-8.

BackgroundAlthough clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation always includes ventilation with pure oxygen, this kind of ventilation has been reported to be associated with worse neurological outcome than ventilation with air in experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The aim of the present investigation was to compare the systemic oxygen uptake during experimental closed-chest CPR including ventilation with pure oxygen or ambient air and, furthermore, to elucidate possible mechanisms of action in the regulation of pulmonary gas exchange.MethodsIn 24 anesthetized piglets, 2 min of induced ventricular fibrillation and no ventilation was followed by 10 min of closed-chest CPR including i.v. administration of 0.5 mg adrenaline (at 8 min), and in one of the experimental groups alkaline buffer (at 5 min). The piglets were randomly divided into 3 groups: air ventilation during the entire CPR period with saline administration (n=8), air ventilation during the entire CPR period plus tris buffer mixture (n=8), and air ventilation for 3 min followed by 100% oxygen with saline administration (n= 8).ResultsIn the group ventilated with air and treated with tris buffer mixture, cardiac output was significantly greater than in the group ventilated with pure oxygen. The arterial-mixed venous oxygen content difference was approximately 25% greater with pure oxygen than with air ventilation; however, there was no difference in systemic oxygen uptake. Systemic oxygen uptake increased after administration of tris buffer mixture in the group ventilated with air.ConclusionsPulmonary hypoxic vasoconstriction appeared to be abolished during CPR including pure oxygen ventilation. Blood flow, not ventilation or pulmonary gas exchange, is the limiting factor during experimental closed-chest CPR.

52 keywords...

hide…