• W G Kim, C Lim, H J Moon, and Y J Kim.
• Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and Heart Research Institute, BK 21 Human Life Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
• Artif Organs. 2000 Nov 1;24(11):908-12.

AbstractUsing young pigs, this study compared the strategies of alpha-stat and pH-stat during deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) for the cooling time of brains during the induction of hypothermia and rewarming time with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB); the cerebral perfusion rate and metabolism rate, and the ratio of these 2 rates; and the extent of the cerebral edema development after circulatory arrest. Fourteen young pigs were assigned to 1 of 2 strategies of gas management. Cerebral blood flow was measured with a cerebral venous outflow technique. With CPB, core cooling was initiated and continued until the nasopharyngeal temperature fell below 20 degrees C. The flow rate was set at 2,500 ml/min. Once the temperature reached below 20 degrees C, the animals were subjected to DHCA for 40 min. During the cooling period, the acid-base balance was maintained using either alpha-stat or pH-stat strategy. After DHCA, the body was rewarmed to the normal body temperature. The animals then were sacrificed, and we measured the brain water content. The cerebral perfusion and metabolism rates were measured before the onset of CPB, before cooling, before DHCA, 15 min after rewarming, and upon the completion of rewarming. The cooling time was significantly shorter with alpha-stat than with pH-stat strategy while no significant differences were observed in the rewarming time between groups. Also, no significant differences were found in cerebral blood flow volume, metabolic rate, or flow/metabolic rate ratio between groups. In each group, the cerebral blood flow volume, metabolic rate, and flow/metabolic rate ratio showed significant differences in body temperature. Brain water content showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. In summary, this study found no significant differences between alpha-stat and pH-stat strategies, except in the cooling time. The cooling time was rather shorter with the alpha-stat than with the pH-stat strategy.

35 keywords...

hide…