• Ulus Travma Acil Cer · May 2009

    [Evaluation of the process and effectiveness of consultation system in the Department of Emergency Medicine].

    • Zeynep Karakaya, Yüksel Gökel, Ayça Açikalin, and Olcay Karakaya.
    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Cukurova University, Faculty of Medicine, Adana. zeynepkarakaya76@hotmail.com
    • Ulus Travma Acil Cer. 2009 May 1;15(3):210-6.

    BackgroundTriage, consultations, and radiological and laboratory test processes have different effects on the total waiting time in the emergency department (ED). Under these circumstances, the importance of the consultation system process and effectiveness of consultation becomes very clear. Our aim in this study was to verify the process of the consultation system.MethodsThis prospective and defining study was performed with 276 patients admitted to the ED. A total of 342 consultations were requested. These patients were classified as very urgent, urgent and non-urgent according to their problems, and a survey form was completed by the ED resident.ResultsThe most frequently requested consultation was to the Department of Internal Medicine (72%). Mean time for reply to the consultation was 29+/-43 minutes. The earliest reply to the consultation was from Cardiology while the latest responders were the general surgeons. Timeline for replying to the consultation was shorter depending on the urgency of the case.ConclusionIn our study, we determined that the most important factor for the effectiveness of consultation was the definition of the urgency of the patients by the residents in the ED. Since the number of patients admitting to the ED will continue to increase in the future, more detailed prospective studies are needed about the efficiency of consultation in the ED.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.