-
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand · Jul 2014
Review Meta Analysis Comparative StudyActive management of the third stage of labor with and without controlled cord traction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
- Yongming Du, Man Ye, and Feiyun Zheng.
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
- Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Jul 1;93(7):626-33.
ObjectiveTo determine the specific effect of controlled cord traction in the third stage of labor in the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage.Data SourcesWe searched PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science (inception to 30 October 2013).Study SelectionRandomized controlled trials comparing controlled cord traction with hands-off management in the third stage of labor were included.ResultsFive randomized controlled trials involving a total of 30 532 participants were eligible. No significant difference was found between controlled cord traction and hands-off management groups with respect to the incidence of severe postpartum hemorrhage (relative risk 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.77-1.08), need for blood transfusion (relative risk 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.69-1.33) or therapeutic uterotonics (relative risk 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.88-1.01). However, controlled cord traction reduced the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage in general (relative risk 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.87-0.99; number-needed-to-treat 111, 95% confidence interval 61-666), as well manual removal of the placenta (relative risk 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.84) and duration of the third stage of labor (mean difference -3.20, 95% confidence interval -3.21 to -3.19).ConclusionsControlled cord traction appears to reduce the risk of any postpartum hemorrhage in a general sense, as well as manual removal of the placenta and the duration of the third stage of labor. However, the reduction in the occurrence of severe postpartum hemorrhage, need for additional uterotonics and blood transfusion is not statistically significant.© 2014 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.