• Laurence Busse, Danielle L Davison, Christopher Junker, and Lakhmir S Chawla.
• Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington DC, USA.
• Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2013 Jan 1;20(1):21-9.

AbstractHemodynamic monitoring is essential to the care of the critically ill patient. In the hemodynamically unstable patient where volume status is not only difficult to determine, but excess fluid administration can lead to adverse consequences, utilizing markers that guide resuscitation can greatly affect outcomes. Several markers and devices have been developed to aid the clinician in assessing volume status with the ultimate goal of optimizing tissue oxygenation and organ perfusion. Early static measures of volume status, including pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure, have largely been replaced by newer dynamic measures that rely on real-time measurements of physiological parameters to calculate volume responsiveness. Technological advances have lead to the creation of invasive and noninvasive devices that guide the physician through the resuscitative process. In this manuscript, we review the physiologic rationale behind hemodynamic monitoring, define the markers of volume status and volume responsiveness, and explore the various devices and technologies available for the bedside clinician.Copyright © 2013 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

23 keywords...

hide…