• Bull Soc Sci Med Grand Duche Luxemb · Jan 2012

    Impact of initial intervention on long-term neurological recovey after cardiac arrest: data from the Luxembourg "North Pole" cohort.

    • P Stammet, D Collas, C Werer, L Muenster, C Clarens, and D Wagner.
    • Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, General Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, 4, rue Barblé, L-1210 Luxembourg, Luxembourg. stammet.pascal@chl.lu
    • Bull Soc Sci Med Grand Duche Luxemb. 2012 Jan 1(1):60-70.

    BackgroundPrognosis after cardiac arrest is variable and difficult to predict. Early prognostic markers would facilitate the care of these patients.AimsTherefore, we evaluated the impact of initial interventions after resuscitation on neurological outcome at 6 months.Material And MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of the patient charts from consecutive cardiac arrest patients admitted to our intensive care unit and treated with induced hypothermia.ResultsOver a 3-year period, 90 patients were included in our study. Sixty-four percent of the patients had bystander cardio-pulmonary resuscitation. An automated external defibrillator (AED) was used in 19% of the patients and the mean time to first defibrillation was 11 +/- 8.9 minutes. Patients being resuscitated and defibrillated by bystanders did better than those who had CPR only and far better than those patients in whom no rescue measures where attempted at all (73% vs. 56% vs. 32% for good neurological outcome, respectively, p= 0.03). Witnessed cardiac arrest was more frequent in patients with a good outcome than in those who collapsed without a witness (91% vs 75%, p = 0.03). In 76% of the patients with good outcome, CPR was performed whereas only 52% benefited from these measures in the bad outcome group (p = 0.01). Although the use of an AED was not significantly different between good and bad outcome groups (26% vs. 11%, p = 0.06), time to first defibrillation was significantly lower in patients with good outcome (8.7 +/- 6.3 vs. 13.3 +/- 11.3 minutes, p = 0.05). In the 17 patients in whom an AED was used, 12 (71%) recovered without major sequelae whereas in the 73 cases where no AED was used, only 34 (47%) had a good outcome (p = 0.06). At 6 months follow-up, 46 (51%) survivors had a good outcome (cerebral performance category 1-2), 5 (6%) survived with severe neurological sequelae or stayed in coma and 39 (43%) died.ConclusionsOur local data confirm that early interventions have a major impact on survival of cardiac arrest patients. Efforts should concentrate on delivering rapid and high quality CPR as well as early defibrillation by AED's to every patient in cardiac arrest. Besides large scale Basic life support training, the introduction of dispatcher assisted CPR and the implementation and use of public AED's could considerably help to improve outcome in these patients.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…