• Medicina intensiva · Oct 2012

    Multicenter Study

    [Prolonged mechanical ventilation probability model].

    • J M Añón, V Gómez-Tello, E González-Higueras, J J Oñoro, V Córcoles, M Quintana, J López-Martínez, L Marina, G Choperena, A M García-Fernández, C Martín-Delgado, F Gordo, R Díaz-Alersi, J C Montejo, A García de Lorenzo, M Pérez-Arriaga, and R Madero.
    • Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Virgen de la Luz, Cuenca, España. jmaelizalde@gmail.com
    • Med Intensiva. 2012 Oct 1;36(7):488-95.

    ObjectiveTo design a probability model for prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) using variables obtained during the first 24 hours of the start of MV.DesignAn observational, prospective, multicenter cohort study.ScopeThirteen Spanish medical-surgical intensive care units.PatientsAdult patients requiring mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours.InterventionsNone.Study VariablesAPACHE II, SOFA, demographic data, clinical data, reason for mechanical ventilation, comorbidity, and functional condition. A multivariate risk model was constructed. The model contemplated a dependent variable with three possible conditions: 1. Early mortality; 2. Early extubation; and 3. PMV.ResultsOf the 1661 included patients, 67.9% (n=1127) were men. Age: 62.1±16.2 years. APACHE II: 20.3±7.5. Total SOFA: 8.4±3.5. The APACHE II and SOFA scores were higher in patients ventilated for 7 or more days (p=0.04 and p=0.0001, respectively). Noninvasive ventilation failure was related to PMV (p=0.005). A multivariate model for the three above exposed outcomes was generated. The overall accuracy of the model in the training and validation sample was 0.763 (95%IC: 0.729-0.804) and 0.751 (95%IC: 0.672-0.816), respectively. The likelihood ratios (LRs) for early extubation, involving a cutoff point of 0.65, in the training sample were LR (+): 2.37 (95%CI: 1.77-3.19) and LR (-): 0.47 (95%CI: 0.41-0.55). The LRs for the early mortality model, for a cutoff point of 0.73, in the training sample, were LR (+): 2.64 (95%CI: 2.01-3.4) and LR (-): 0.39 (95%CI: 0.30-0.51).ConclusionsThe proposed model could be a helpful tool in decision making. However, because of its moderate accuracy, it should be considered as a first approach, and the results should be corroborated by further studies involving larger samples and the use of standardized criteria.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier España, S.L. y SEMICYUC. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.