• R R Pindzola, J R Balzer, E M Nemoto, S Goldstein, and H Yonas.
• Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. pindzola@neuronet.pitt.edu
• Stroke. 2001 Aug 1;32(8):1811-7.

Background And PurposeCerebrovascular reserve (CVR) by both transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) and quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) can identify subgroups of patients at increased risk for stroke. A direct comparison of CVR measurements obtained with both technologies in patients with cerebrovascular occlusive disease is lacking.MethodsCVRs before and after acetazolamide administration (1 g IV) were measured by TCD insonation of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) and CBF obtained with stable xenon CT (Xe/CT) in 38 patients with carotid occlusive disease. Sensitivity/specificity calculations were based on 2 Xe/CT MCA values: an average over 4 levels and the level with the lowest percent change in CBF. Compromised CVR was defined as no reactivity or a decrease in reactivity.ResultsUsing the analysis of the systolic TCD, we found that velocity changes compared with the average Xe/CT MCA CVR showed a sensitivity of 33%, specificity of 90.6%, positive predictive value of 54.5%, and negative predictive value of 80%. The sensitivity of TCD compared with the lowest Xe/CT CBF CVR was 35.5%, specificity and positive predictive values were 100%, and negative predictive value was 66.7%. The index of validity was between 72% and 76%.ConclusionsTCD is much less sensitive than Xe/CT CBF in identifying patients with compromised CVR. This may be a result of the inability of TCD to identify patients with compromised reserves when their MCA blood flow comes from collateral sources. The lack of correlation between TCD and Xe/CT CBF for identifying patients with compromised CVR should be considered when stroke risk assessments are made by TCD.

32 keywords...

hide…