-
Comparative Study
[Interdisciplinary interventional therapy for tracheobronchial stenosis with modern metal net stents].
- J Rieger, U Linsenmaier, H Hautmann, A Fedorowski, R M Huber, and K J Pfeifer.
- Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany. jrieger@radin.med.uni-muenchen.de
- Rofo. 2002 Aug 1;174(8):1009-14.
Study ObjectivesAssessment of the therapeutic potential of tracheobronchial stenting for obstructive tracheobronchial disease, in-vivo comparison of different stent types and development of helpful criteria for choosing the suitable stent type.Material And MethodsProspective case analysis. Between 1993 and 1999 53 stents were implanted into the tracheobronchial system of 39 consecutive patients with benign or malignant airway obstruction. Every single stent (26 Strecker Stents, 18 Wallstents, 6 Accuflex Nitinolstents, 1 Dumon-, 1 Rüsch- and 1 Palmazstent) was recorded in an unified database. Analysis comprised clinical effectiveness, lung function if possible, relevant complications and radiologic follow-up parameters. The probability of their remaining within the tracheobronchial system, of their remaining undislocated and uncompressed was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis for three stent types.ResultsStent placement proved itself to be an effective treatment in 86 % of the patients. Resistance could be normalized in 9/9 patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis clearly revealed a higher probability for the Wall- and Nitinolstent to remain within the tracheobronchial system and to remain uncompressed. Dislocation also occurred more rarely. Explantation of the Wallstent, however, if desired, was much more difficult compared to the Strecker stent. The Wallstent also occasionally led to the formation of granulation tissue especially at the proximal stent end and, as such, required reintervention.ConclusionAny of the 3 stent types proved to be an effective therapeutic option in the management of obstructive tracheobronchial disease. Choise of the stent type should be determined through definition of the therapeutic intention. It is useful to distinguish between (a) benign stenosis, (b) malignant stenosis but curative therapeutic situation and (c) malignant stenosis in a palliative therapeutic situation with limited life expectancy. In spite of its superior mechanical properties the Wallstent is rather suited for a palliative situation because explantation may be difficult. The Strecker Stent requires more reinterventions but removal is easy to perform. The Nitinolstent possibly represents a reasonable compromise.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.