• Actas Urol Esp · Jul 2000

    [Diagnostic algorithm based on a multivariate model to reduce the percentage of negative prostatic biopsies in patients with changed PSA or suspicious rectal palpation].

    • J Valer Algarabel, L Agüera Fernández, J M Adot Zurbano, M Virseda Chamorro, J Marcos Díez, A Gómez López, and C Alpuente Román.
    • Servicio de Urología, Hospital Militar de Burgos.
    • Actas Urol Esp. 2000 Jul 1;24(7):549-59.

    ObjectivesTo determine what tests have a better diagnosis utility in patient with suspected prostate cancer due to PSA equal or greater than 4 ng/ml or abnormal digital rectal examination in order to reduce the number of negative prostate biopsies.Material And MethodsWe carried out a ultrasound-guided sextant transrectal biopsy in a series of 400 patient with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels equal or greater than 4 ng/ml or abnormal digital rectal examination. All patients had also transrectal rectal ultrasonography to value the echographic prostatic characteristics and the prostatic volume, and a free PSA determination.ResultsThe free/total PSA ratio (PSAl) and the PSA density (DPSA) were the most powerful predictors of prostate cancer, both with a 66% sensitivity and a 70% specificity (at a 0.15 cutoff), followed by the total PSA (PSAt), the digital rectal examination and the hypoechogenic prostatic nodules. We constructed a logistic multivariate model with these data. The outcome variable of logistic model was the probability of having prostate cancer. The significant predictive variables of the model were the PSAl, the DPSA, the digital rectal examination and the presence and extension of hypoechogenic prostatic. This model had a 81% sensitivity and 79% specificity at a 0.24 probability cutoff. We considered a 0.1 probability cutoff to reduce the number of false negative. With this strategy the sensitivity was 94% and the specificity 54%. If we had applied this model to the patient of our series then, we would be able to avoid prostate biopsy in 164 cases (the 41% of the patient), leaving only 7 cases without diagnosis of prostate cancer.ConclusionsThe most effective combination parameters were the digital rectal examination, PSAl, presence and extension of prostatic hypoechogenic zones and DPSA. This combination allows us to diminish the percentage of negative prostate biopsy in patient with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels equal or greater than 4 ng/ml or abnormal digital rectal examination without significantly descending the number of detected prostate cancers.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.