• V Ambăruş, C Rezuş, R Artenie, Mirela Ciutea, and Mariana Floria.
• Facultatea de Medicină Clinica a III-a Medicală-Cardiologică, Universitatea de Medicină si Farmacie "Gr.T. Popa" Iaşi.
• Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2009 Jul 1;113(3):673-9.

UnlabelledLeft atrial size, most frequently assessed for practical reasons by echocardiography, is important in clinical decision-making. Left atrium volume measurements allow an accurate assessment of asymmetric remodeling and reverse remodeling in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients.AimTo assess a new method (CTEL2) derived from CT scan by ellipsoid formula (CTEL1) to measure LA volume, we compared the conventional echocardiography-ellipsoid method (EEL), as a reference, with CTEL1 and with the new method-CTEL2.Material And MethodLeft atrium volume was measured by EEL and CTEL2 in 40 consecutive pts (group 1, 56 +/- 12 years, 80% men) and by EEL and CTEL1, in another 46 consecutive patients (group 2, 58 +/- 11 years, 80% men) with AF. For measurements by CTEL2 we used the same formula as the ellipsoid method but as optimal view for the orthogonal dimensions were taken every time the last axial section just under the superior veins (atrialized in dilated left atrium). Usual, the dimensions are taken on the largest axial left atrium area. The correlation coefficients were compared by Z test with Fisher inverse tank transformation.ResultsMean left atrium volume irrespective of methods was > 50 mL. We found a good and significant correlation between CTEL1 and EEL (r1 = 0.769; p < 0.001) but a much better between CTEL2 and EEL (r1 = 0.915; p < 0.001). Both r1 and r2 coefficients were significantly stronger for the correlation with CTEL2 and with CTEL1 (p = 0.016).ConclusionsThis new technique evaluation for left atrium volume is adequacy and could avoid an overestimation or underestimation of LA remodelation assessment, as standard ellipsoid method, in specific situations as cardioversion or AF ablation.

25 keywords...

hide…