• Lauren S Prescott, Lisa M Kidin, Rebecca L Downs, David J Cleveland, Ginger L Wilson, Mark F Munsell, Alma Y DeJesus, Katherine E Cain, Pedro T Ramirez, Michael H Kroll, Charles F Levenback, and Kathleen M Schmeler.
• Departments of *Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, †Performance Improvement, ‡Diagnostic Imaging, §Clinical Effectiveness, ∥Pharmacy, ¶Biostatistics, and #Benign Hematology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
• Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2015 Jan 1;25(1):152-9.

ObjectiveNational guidelines recommend prophylactic anticoagulation for all hospitalized patients with cancer to prevent hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, adherence to these evidence-based recommended practice patterns remains low. We performed a quality improvement (QI) project to increase VTE pharmacologic prophylaxis rates among patients with gynecologic malignancies hospitalized for nonsurgical indications and evaluated the resulting effect on rates of development of VTE.Materials And MethodsIn June 2011, departmental VTE practice guidelines were implemented for patients with gynecologic malignancies who were hospitalized for nonsurgical indications. A standardized VTE prophylaxis module was added to the admission electronic order sets. Outcome measures included number of admissions receiving VTE pharmacologic prophylaxis within 24 hours of admission; and number of potentially preventable hospital-acquired VTEs diagnosed within 30 and 90 days of discharge. Outcomes were compared between a preguideline implementation cohort (n = 99), a postguideline implementation cohort (n = 127), and a sustainability cohort assessed 2 years after implementation (n = 109). Patients were excluded if upon admission they had a VTE, were considered low risk for VTE, or had a documented contraindication to pharmacologic prophylaxis.ResultsAdministration of pharmacologic prophylaxis within 24 hours of admission increased from 20.8% to 88.2% immediately following the implementation of guidelines, but declined to 71.8% in our sustainability cohort (P < 0.001). There was no difference in VTE incidence among the 3 cohorts [n = 2 (4.2%) vs n = 3 (3.9%) vs n = 3 (4.2%), respectively; P = 1.00].ConclusionsOur QI project improved pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis rates. A small decrease in prophylaxis during the subsequent 2 years suggests a need for continued surveillance to optimize QI initiatives. Despite increased adherence to guidelines, VTE rates did not decline in this high-risk population.

29 keywords...

hide…