• J Spinal Disord Tech · Aug 2014

    Radiographic analysis of PEEK cage and FRA in adult spinal deformity fused to sacrum.

    • Zongmiao Wan, Min Dai, Jun Miao, Guoan Li, and Kirkham B Wood.
    • *Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China †Department of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
    • J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Aug 1;27(6):327-35.

    Study DesignRetrospective radiographic study.ObjectiveTo radiographically evaluate sagittal plane profile and fusion rates of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages versus femoral ring allografts (FRAs) in patients with adult spinal deformity fused to the sacrum.Summary Of Background DataFRAs have been widely used in various degenerative lumbar spine disorders and in adult deformity to achieve interbody fusions with promising results. PEEK cages have gained increasing popularity of late; however, there is little documentation to the radiographic comparisons between PEEK cages and FRAs used in patients with adult spine deformity treated with long fusions to the sacrum.MethodsFrom March 2006 to February 2010, we analyzed 48 patients (mean age, 56.3±13.9 y) of 61 consecutive adult patients with global coronal and sagittal adult spine deformities who underwent first stage ALIF using PEEK cages or FRAs at L4-L5, L5-S1 segments followed by long (>6 levels) posterior instrumentation. PEEK cages and FRAs were used randomly according to surgeon's preference. Two independent observers retrospectively evaluated preoperative and postoperative disk height, foraminal height, segmental lordosis, and the interbody fusion rates at different postoperative intervals.ResultsBoth PEEK cages and FRAs significantly (P<0.05) maintained disk space height at all follow-up times. PEEK cages maintained foraminal height and segmental lordosis, especially at L4-L5 better than FRAs at the final follow-up. At the final follow-up, PEEK cages achieved 94.9% of fusion rate, which was significantly (P<0.05) superior to FRA (84.2%), and PEEK cages were superior to FRAs in attaining earlier solid fusion. The Prolo functional scores of FRAs or/and PEEK cages were significantly improved at the final follow-up and did not show a significant difference between them.ConclusionsBoth PEEK cages and FRAs can significantly increase disk space height and achieve similar clinical outcomes in treating adult spinal deformity fused to the sacrum. The radiographic results of PEEK cages were superior to FRAs in terms of an earlier solid fusion, and greater restoration of segmental lordosis.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…