• D Santosh, S Lakhtakia, R Gupta, D N Reddy, G V Rao, M Tandan, M Ramchandani, and N M Guda.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India. sant_dari@yahoo.com
• Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2009 May 1;29(9):979-84.

BackgroundCoeliac plexus block (CPB) is a management option for pain control in chronic pancreatitis. CPB is conventionally performed by percutaneous technique with fluoroscopic guidance (PCFG). Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is increasingly used for CPB as it offers a better visualization of the plexus. There are limited data comparing the two modalities.AimTo compare the pain relief in chronic pancreatitis among patients undergoing CPB either by PCFG technique or by EUS guided technique.MethodsChronic pancreatitis patients with abdominal pain requiring daily analgesics for more than 4 weeks were included. Fifty six consecutive patients (41 males, 15 females) participated in the study. EUSG-CPB was performed in 27 and PCFG-CPB in 29 patients. In both the groups, 10 mL of Bupivacaine (0.25%) and 3 mL of Triamcinolone (40 mg) were given on both sides of the coeliac artery through separate punctures.ResultsPre and post procedure pain scores were obtained using a 0-10 visual analogue scale. Improvement in pain scores was seen in 70% of subjects undergoing EUS-CPB and 30% in Percutaneous- block group (P = 0.044).ConclusionsEUS-guided coeliac block appears to be better than PCFG-CPB for controlling abdominal pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis.

27 keywords...

hide…