• Gianna Pace, Pietro Saldutto, Carlo Vicentini, and Lucio Miano.
• Department of Surgical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, San Salvatore Street, Palace 6 A, Coppito, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy. giannapace@gmail.com
• World J Surg Oncol. 2010 Jan 1;8:37.

Background30 patients, with T1 renal cell carcinomas (RCC) who underwent open enucleoresection of the tumour, were randomized to the use of a topical haemostatic agent (Floseal) or to an infrared-sapphire coagulator (ISC), to compare their efficacy in achieving haemostasis.MethodsSuccessful intra-operative haemostasis, intra- and post-operative bleeding, operative time, hospital discharge were evaluated.ResultsStatistically higher rates of successful haemostasis and shorter time-to-haemostasis (8,1 vs 12,9 min) were observed in the FloSeal group (p < 0.001 both). Patients operative time was not different between Group 1 vs 2 (58.7 +/- 12 vs 62.4 +/- 15; p > 0.05). The average blood loss during surgery was less (60 +/- 25.5 mL) for the FloSeal group than for the ISC group (85 +/- 40.5 mL) (p < 0.05). Postoperative blood loss was 25 +/- 5 mL and 40 +/- 45 mL for Floseal and ISC respectively, (p < 0.05). Length of the postoperative hospital discharge was 2.5 +/- 1.2 days for FloSeal group and 3.5 +/- 1.3 for the Group 2 (p < 0.05). No major immediate or delayed complications were observed in either Groups.ConclusionsThe use of Floseal and ISC offer a safe and efficacy haemostasis in the enucleoresection of RCC. Moreover, our results show a less intra-operative and post-operative blood loss as well as a shorter time to haemostasis of Floseal in respect to ISC.

27 keywords...

hide…