-
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol · Jan 2002
Intracranial effects of endotracheal suctioning in the acute phase of head injury.
- Marco Gemma, Concezione Tommasino, Marco Cerri, Antonella Giannotti, Barbara Piazzi, and Tosca Borghi.
- University of Milano, Institute of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Neurointensive Care Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy.
- J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2002 Jan 1;14(1):50-4.
AbstractIn patients with head injury, endotracheal suctioning (ETS) is a potentially dangerous procedure, because it can increase intracranial pressure (ICP). The purpose of this prospective nonrandomized study was to evaluate the impact of ETS on intracranial dynamics in the acute phase of head injury. Seventeen patients with severe head injury (Glasgow Coma Score < or = 8, range 4-8), sedated and mechanically ventilated, were studied during the first week after trauma. Single-pass ETS maneuver (with a 16-French catheter, negative pressure of 100 mm Hg, and duration of less than 30 seconds) was performed 60 seconds after the FiO2 was increased to 100%. After ETS, FiO2 was maintained at 100% for another 30 seconds. Before and after ETS, arterial blood gases and jugular oxygen saturation (S(j)O2), ICP, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) was calculated. A total of 131 ETS episodes, which consisted of repeated assessment of each patient, were analyzed. Six patients in 20 cases coughed and/or moved during ETS because of inadequate sedation. After ETS, ICP increased from 20 +/- 12 to 22 +/- 13 mm Hg in well-sedated patients and from 15 +/- 9 to 28 +/- 9 mm Hg in patients who coughed and/or moved (mean change, 2 +/- 6 versus 13 +/- 6 mm Hg, P <.0001). CPP and S(j)O2 increased in well-sedated patients (from 78 +/- 16 to 83 +/- 19 mm Hg, and from 71 +/- 10 to 73 +/- 13%, respectively) and decreased in patients who reacted to ETS (from 79 +/- 14 to 72 +/- 14 mm Hg and from 69 +/- 7 to 66 +/- 9%, respectively), and the differences were significant (mean change, CPP: 5 +/- 14 versus -7 +/- 15 mm Hg, P =.003; (S(j)O2) 2 +/- 5 vs. -3 +/- 5%, P <.0001). In well-sedated patients, endotracheal suctioning caused an increase in ICP, CPP, and S j O 2 without evidence of ischemia. In contrast, in patients who coughed or moved in response to suctioning, there was a slight and significant decrease in CPP and S(j)O2. In the case of patients with head injuries who coughed or moved during endotracheal suctioning, we strongly suggest deepening the level of sedation before completing the procedure to reduce the risk of adverse effects.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.