-
Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Day surgery for cervical microdiscectomy: is it safe and effective?
- H R Silvers, P J Lewis, L S Suddaby, H L Asch, D E Clabeaux, and L E Blumenson.
- Department of Biometry, State University of New York at Buffalo, USA.
- J Spinal Disord. 1996 Aug 1;9(4):287-93.
AbstractThe objective of this pilot study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cervical discectomy with fusion performed on an outpatient basis. The experimental group (50 consecutive patients) was studied prospectively and the outcomes were compared with 53 consecutive, retrospectively analyzed, admitted controls who underwent the same procedure. Outcomes for both groups were assessed by patient-response questionnaires and clinical examination. At follow-up times of 1.3 (outpatient) and 1.6 (inpatient) years, outcomes (outpatient/inpatient) expressed as percent successful were as follows: Relief of arm pain (80/70%); relief of neck pain (78/68%); relief of arm muscle weakness and atrophy (94/96%); return to normal activities (64/70%); return to work (65/68%); and satisfaction with the results of surgery (86/83%). No statistically significant differences between outpatients and inpatients were found for any of the outcome parameters studied. There was no mortality and the operative complication rate was 2% for each study group. The results indicate that conversion of cervical discectomy with fusion from an admitted to an ambulatory practice did not compromise the safety or efficacy of the surgical procedure. Potential economic savings to overall health costs of the United States that might result from such conversion could exceed $100 million annually.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.