• Zhonghua yi xue za zhi · Feb 2015

    [Efficacies of fluid resuscitation as guided by lactate clearance rate and central venous oxygen saturation in patients with septic shock].

    • Xiaochun Lyu, Qianghong Xu, Guolong Cai, Jing Yan, and Molei Yan.
    • Department of Critical Care, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou 310013, China.
    • Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Feb 17;95(7):496-500.

    ObjectiveTo estimate the efficacies of fluid resuscitations as guided by lactate clearance rate (LC) and central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO₂) in patients with septic shock.Methods100 patients diagnosed with septic shock from June 2012 to June 2014 in department of critical care medicine of sixteen hospitals were enrolled. They were randomly divided into two groups of study and control (each n = 50). After a diagnosis of sepsis shock, they were treated symptomatically timely and fluid resuscitation was started as early as possible according to the 2008 Guideline for Managing Sepsis & Septic Shock. Central venous pressure (CVP) ≥ 8 mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa), mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥ 65 mmHg, urine output ≥ 0.5 ml × kg⁻¹ × h⁻¹, ScvO₂≥ 70% and LC ≥ 10% (or lactate ≤ 2.0 mmol) served as target values for fluid resuscitation therapy in study group versus CVP ≥ 8 mmHg, MAP ≥ 65 mmHg, urine output ≥ 0.5 ml × kg⁻¹ × h⁻¹ and ScvO₂≥ 70% in control group. The general conditions and clinical characteristics, changes in CVP, MAP, urine output, ScvO₂, lactate level and/or LC before (0 hour) and every hour (1-6 h) after the start of fluid resuscitation and other related outcome indicators were recorded.ResultsNo significant difference existed in general data. The 28-day mortality was 40% for study group versus 56% for control group. There was no significant inter-group difference (P > 0.05). The time of mechanical ventilation and length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay were lower in study group than those in control group [mechanical ventilation time (11.200 ± 17.069) vs (15.760 ± 14.215), P = 0.150; length of ICU stay (13.240 ± 17.127) vs (23.980 ± 18.298), P = 0.003]. The 28-day mortality was independently associated with LC and ScvO₂reaching target values for fluid resuscitation in study group (χ² = 10.930, P = 0.001) while the 28-day mortality was independently associated with ScvO₂reaching target value for fluid resuscitation in control group (χ² = 6.395, P = 0.011). Among all patients, the 28-day mortality was independently associated with ScvO₂reaching target value for fluid resuscitation (χ² = 14.530, P = 0.000), but not LC (χ² = 1.175, P = 0.278).ConclusionA combination of LC and ScvO₂may serve an index in confirming the endpoint of fluid resuscitation for patients with septic shock. Fluid resuscitation therapy under the guidance of LC and ScvO₂is more accurate and reliable than the guidance of ScvO₂alone.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.