• Umberto Tarantino, Alessio Giai Via, Ernesto Macrì, Alessandro Eramo, Valeria Marino, and Luigi Tonino Marsella.
• Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Policlinico Tor Vergata, University of Rome "Tor Vergata" School of Medicine, Rome, Italy, umberto.tarantino@uniroma2.it.
• Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2013 Oct 1;471(10):3349-57.

BackgroundInterest in medical errors has increased during the last few years owing to the number of medical malpractice claims. Reasons for the increasing number of claims may be related to patients' higher expectations, iatrogenic injury, and the growth of the legal services industry. Claims analysis provides helpful information in specialties in which a higher number of errors occur, highlighting areas where orthopaedic care might be improved.Questions/PurposesWe determined: (1) the number of claims involving orthopaedics and traumatology in Rome; (2) the risk of litigation in elective and trauma surgery; (3) the most common surgical procedures involved in claims and indemnity payments; (4) the time between the adverse medical event and the judgment date; and (5) issues related to informed consent.MethodsWe analyzed 1925 malpractice judgments decided in the Civil Court of Rome between 2004 and 2010.ResultsIn total, 243 orthopaedics claims were filed, and in 75% of these cases surgeons were found liable; 149 (61%) of these resulted from elective surgery. Surgical teams were sued in 30 claims and found liable in 22. The total indemnity payment ordered was more than €12,350,000 (USD 16,190,000). THA and spinal surgery were the most common surgical procedures involved. Inadequate informed consent was reported in 5.3% of cases.ConclusionsOur study shows that careful medical examination, accurate documentation in medical records, and adequate informed consent might reduce the number of claims. We suggest monitoring of court judgments would be useful to develop prevention strategies to reduce claims.

21 keywords...

hide…