• Colin Walsh, Eugenia L Siegler, Erin Cheston, Heather O'Donnell, Sarah Collins, Daniel Stein, David K Vawdrey, Peter D Stetson, and Informatics Intervention Research Collaboration (I2RC).
• Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York.
• J Hosp Med. 2013 Oct 1;8(10):589-97.

BackgroundElectronic communication between providers occurs daily in clinical practice but has not been well studied.PurposeTo assess the impact of provider-to-provider electronic communication tools on communication and healthcare outcomes through literature review.Data SourcesOvid MEDLINE, PubMed, Google Scholar, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Academic Search Premier.Study SelectionPublication in English-language peer-reviewed journals. Studies provided quantitative provider-to-provider communication data, provider satisfaction statistics, or electronic health record (EHR) communication data.Data ExtractionLiterature review.Data SynthesisTwo reviewers conducted the title review to determine eligible studies from initial search results. Three reviewers independently reviewed titles, abstracts, and full text (where appropriate) against inclusion and exclusion criteria.LimitationsSmall number of eligible studies; few described trial design (20%). Homogeneous provider type (physicians). English-only studies.ConclusionsOf 25 included studies, all focused on physicians; most were observational (68%). Most (60%) described electronic specialist referral tools. Although overall use has been measured, there were no studies of the effectiveness of intra-EHR messaging. Literature describing the effectiveness of provider-to-provider electronic communications is sparse and narrow in scope. Complex care, such as that envisioned for the Patient Centered Medical Home, necessitates further research.© 2013 Society of Hospital Medicine.

22 keywords...

hide…