• Medicina · Jan 2009

    Comparative Study

    [Aortic root surgery: early postoperative results of different surgical techniques].

    • Rimantas Benetis, Egle Ereminiene, Povilas Jakuska, Dainius Karciauskas, Sarūnas Kinduris, Algimantas Budrikis, Adakrius Siudikas, Jolanta Justina Vaskelyte, Algimantas Sasnauskas, Juozas Sakalauskas, and Kastytis Vaiciulis.
    • Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, Kaunas University of Medicine, Eiveniu 2, Kaunas.
    • Medicina (Kaunas). 2009 Jan 1; 45 (3): 197202197-202.

    UnlabelledThe aim of the study was to evaluate early postoperative results of different surgical techniques of aortic root surgery.Material And MethodsBetween January 2004 and November 2007, a cohort of 83 patients underwent aortic root surgery in the Heart Center, Hospital of Kaunas University of Medicine. Patients were divided into three groups: Group 1 (18 patients) - reimplantation of the aortic valve within a vascular graft (David operation), Group 2 (48 patients) - replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic valve using a valved conduit (Bentall de Bono operation), and Group 3 (17 patients) - biological aortic root replacement. Study protocol included clinical data, operative data, and postoperative major adverse effects: reoperations for bleeding, stroke and lethal outcomes.ResultsPatients undergoing biological aortic root replacement were older as compared with other groups. The mean age in the Group 1 was 50.3+/-3.5 years vs. 57+/-2.0 years in the Group 2 and 67.8+/-3.3 years in the Group 3 (P<0.05). The main indication for the aortic root surgery was the aneurysm of the aortic root and ascending aorta in the Group 1 and 2 patients (64.7% and 72%), while in the Group 3, the main indication was fibrocalcinosis of aortic valve, aortic annulus, and ascending aorta (61.1%). The 30-day hospital mortality rates were as follows: 5.8% (n=1), in the Group 1; 10.4% (n=5), in the Group 2; 5.5% (n=1), in the Group 3. In the early postoperative period, 11 reoperations were performed due to bleeding events: in the Group 1, after planned/emergency surgery (n=2/2), and in the Group 2 (n=1/6), respectively. The function of aortic valve improved significantly in all groups of patients early after surgery. In the Group 1, the degree of aortic regurgitation decreased from 2.5+/-0.8 to 1.1+/-0.6 (P<0.05); in the Groups 2 and 3, the mean gradient through the aortic valve decreased from 39.9+/-7.5 to 17.1+/-5.3 mm Hg and from 48.8+/-18.0 to 20.1+/-11.0 mm Hg, respectively (P<0.05). No reoperation for aortic valve failure before the discharge was required in all groups of patients, and neither thromboembolic complications nor stroke events were noted in any group.ConclusionsDifferent aortic root surgery techniques showed similar postoperative results. New aortic root surgery methods such as aortic root-preserving/sparing procedures and concurrent aortic valve leaflet repair or aortic root replacement with the bioprosthesis can be selected for a diverse class of aortic root pathology with low perioperative mortality rates and good early postoperative results.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…