• J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. · Nov 2010

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Randomized, controlled trial of individualized heparin and protamine management in infants undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

    • Colleen E Gruenwald, Cedric Manlhiot, Anthony K Chan, Lynn Crawford-Lean, Celeste Foreman, Helen M Holtby, Glen S Van Arsdell, Ross Richards, Helen Moriarty, and Brian W McCrindle.
    • Labatt Family Heart Centre, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. colleen.gruenwald@sickkids.ca
    • J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010 Nov 23;56(22):1794-802.

    ObjectivesWe sought to determine whether infants (younger than 1 year old) had similar clinical benefits with individualized anticoagulation management as older children and adult undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).BackgroundIndividualized heparin and protamine management in older children and adults undergoing CPB has been associated with improved clinical outcomes.MethodsNinety infants younger than 1 year of age undergoing CPB were enrolled in a randomized, controlled trial comparing weight-based anticoagulation management using activated clotting time (ACT) to individualized management with Hemostasis Management System Plus. Manufacturer's guidelines were followed for the first 33 patients. A modified protocol was used for the last 57 patients with adjustments for coagulation system immaturity and hemodilution on CPB.ResultsThe hemostasis management system (HMS) device consistently underestimated plasma anti-Xa levels, leading to an overestimated required heparin dose. After a blinded interim analysis revealed poor outcomes in the experimental HMS group using manufacturer guidelines, the safety committee suspended the study pending protocol modifications. The use of the HMS device following the modified protocol resulted in more stable anti-Xa levels during CPB with improved post-operative outcomes including reduced need for transfusions (71 ml/kg vs. 80 ml/kg; p = 0.003), ventilation time (33 h vs. 49 h; p = 0.04), intensive care (88 h vs. 99 h; p = 0.003), and hospital length of stay (192 h vs. 216 h; p < 0.001), compared with the weight-based protocol.ConclusionsThis study supports the use of the HMS device, with a modified protocol for infants younger than 1 year of age, for anticoagulation management during CPB. Clinical guidelines for the use of the HMS device should be modified for infants younger than 1 year of age.Copyright © 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.