• Spine · Jan 2003

    Discriminant validity and relative precision for classifying patients with nonspecific neck and back pain by anatomic pain patterns.

    • Mark Werneke and Dennis L Hart.
    • CentraState Medical Center, Spine Center, Freehold, New Jersey 07728, USA. mwerneke@juno.com
    • Spine. 2003 Jan 15;28(2):161-6.

    Study DesignSecondary analysis of a previously described cohort of prospective, consecutive patients with acute neck or low back pain referred to outpatient rehabilitation was performed.ObjectiveTo estimate discriminant validity and relative precision of two classification procedures (first visit vs multiple visit) in discriminating short-term pain intensity and perceived disability outcomes.Summary Of Background DataCentralization and noncentralization are pain responses used to classify patients and predict outcomes. Different time frames have been proposed for operationally defining these responses, which are problematic for comparing outcomes across clinical trials. Classifying patients according to pain response observed from initial examination (first visit) and over time (multiple visits) influences prevalence within categories and interpretation of classification usefulness, which merits further investigation.MethodsPatients with acute onset of nonspecific neck or low back pain referred to two outpatient physical therapy clinics completed body pain diagrams, pain intensity ratings, and disability questionnaires at initial evaluation, during each visit, and at discharge. Therapists collected data enabling patient classification on initial examination and throughout treatment. Differences in pain and disability from intake to discharge from rehabilitation across classification categories were used to assess discriminant validity. Relative precision was estimated by determining ratios of analysis of covariance F values between classification procedures for pain and disability.ResultsBoth classification procedures discriminated categories for change in pain and disability. The multiple-visit classification procedure was more precise for discriminating outcomes than the first-visit classification procedure.ConclusionMultiple-visit classification of patients into specific pain pattern subgroups is recommended when pain intensity and disability outcomes are of interest.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…