• P Gierer, J Landes, M Grubwinkler, G Gradl, G Lob, and H J Andress.
• Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Abteilung für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universität Rostock, Germany. philip.gierer@med.uni-rostock.de
• Zentralbl Chir. 2002 Jun 1;127(6):514-8.

AbstractThis is a report on the treatment results of femoral neck fractures with a cemented (group 1) and cementless (group 2) type of hip prosthesis, resp. 72 patients were enrolled. 35 patients were treated with a cemented hip prosthesis (mean age: 78 years), and 37 patients with a cementless modular hip prosthesis (mean age: 77 years). In the cemented group we observed 5 cases of hypotension during insertion of the prosthesis in the femoral shaft. One of these patients required mechanical resuscitation during surgery. In the second group 3 cases of proximal femur fissure and one case of distal femoral fracture were recorded. One year after surgery 43 patients presented for follow up evaluation (cemented group: n = 24; cementless group: n = 19). Both groups revealed comparable results according to the Harris Hip Score (75 versus 78,3 points). No prosthesis loosening was observed in either group. In our view the cemented hip prosthesis is the treatment of choice for femoral neck fractures among the old and very old, if no stabile osteosynthesis can be performed. Patients with cardiopulmonary risk factors, however, may profit from cementless hip arthroplasty to avoid the well known cardiodepression during surgery.

18 keywords...

hide…