• J N Davies, D R Allen, and A D Chant.
• Vascular Surgical Unit, Royal South Hampshire Hospital, Southampton, U.K.
• Eur J Vasc Surg. 1991 Oct 1;5(5):497-500.

AbstractThe high mortality and morbidity related to cardiac events remains a considerable problem in vascular surgery. Predicting high risk patients is difficult except perhaps by coronary angiography which is invasive, costly and impractical. It would be useful to have a technique which could easily measure cardiac output and stratify cardiac risk in patients needing vascular surgery. Doppler-derived cardiac output may be such a technique. It offers considerable advantages over Swan-Ganz thermodilution measurement in that it is non-invasive, continuous, inexpensive, and requires only limited technical skill and training. In order to assess and validate a Doppler cardiac output monitor (ACCUCOM 2, Datascope Medical Co. Ltd.), we undertook a prospective study comparing Doppler-derived measurements with those obtained by thermodilution and Fick methods. Twelve patients undergoing elective coronary angiography were studied. Swan-Ganz thermodilution catheters were inserted on completion of cardiac catheterisation and five consecutive thermodilution and Doppler measurements made in each patient. Oxygen saturation from pulmonary artery and aortic blood samples, and a single indirect Fick cardiac output, were calculated. Linear regression analysis for Doppler against thermodilution gave a correlation co-efficient (r) of 0.81 (p less than 0.002), and (r) for Doppler against the Fick method was 0.76 (p less than 0.02). Bland and Altman's statistical method showed the differences to be normally distributed. The mean difference (thermodilution minus Doppler) was 0.32 l/min SD 0.48 l/min, 95% confidence limits -0.64 to +1.28 l/min. Doppler-derived cardiac output compares well with traditional methods of measurement and may be a useful tool in the assessment and monitoring of the high risk vascular patient.

29 keywords...

hide…