• Daniela Aires Lemes, Walter Araujo Zin, and Fernando Silva Guimaraes.
• Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janiero, Brazil.
• Aust J Physiother. 2009 Jan 1;55(4):249-54.

QuestionIs ventilator-induced hyperinflation in sidelying more effective than sidelying alone in removing secretions and improving respiratory mechanics in ventilated patients with pulmonary infection?DesignRandomised crossover trial with concealed allocation and intention-to-treat analysis.Participants30 mechanically ventilated patients with pulmonary infection in an adult intensive care unit.InterventionThe experimental intervention was 30 minutes of ventilator-induced hyperinflation using pressure support ventilation in sidelying; the control intervention was 30 minutes of sidelying. Participants received both interventions on the same day, with a five-hour washout period between them.Outcome MeasuresSecretion clearance was measured as sputum volume retrieved during the intervention. Respiratory mechanics were measured as static compliance and total resistance of the respiratory system before and after the intervention.ResultsThe experimental intervention cleared 1.3 ml (95% CI 0.5 to 2.2) more secretions than the control. After ventilator-induced hyperinflation in sidelying, respiratory compliance had increased 4.7 ml/cmH(2)O (95% CI 2.6 to 6.8) more than in sidelying alone. There was no difference in total resistance of the respiratory system between the interventions (mean difference 0.3 cmH(2)O/l/s, 95% CI -0.8 to 1.3).ConclusionThe application of hyperinflation using pressure support ventilation in mechanically ventilated patients with pulmonary infection improves secretion clearance and increases static compliance of the respiratory system.

22 keywords...

hide…