• Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Jul 1996

    Dural puncture: the patients' perspective. A patient survey of cases at a DGH maternity unit 1983-1993.

    • S N Costigan and J S Sprigge.
    • Arrowe Park Hospital, Upton, Wirral, United Kingdom.
    • Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996 Jul 1;40(6):710-4.

    BackgroundThis study was designed to investigate the patient experience following accidental dural puncture complicating obstetric epidural analgesia.MethodsSixty-three patients who had suffered from accidental dural puncture during obstetric epidural analgesia over a ten-year period were sent a questionnaire enquiring about their experiences. 68% responded.ResultsHeadache was the most severe symptom, occurring in 86% of this group; it lasted for a median of eight days and recurred after discharge in 47%. Backache occurred in 70% and 58% suffered with backache following discharge. Headache was considered to be the worst aspect by 49% of responders, backache by 19% and bedrest by 33%. Bed rest was frequently voluntary (as opposed to being enforced on medical orders) since many patients only gained relief from their headache when supine. Twenty patients (47%) received a blood patch, which was effective in relieving headache in 14 patients; however, the headache recurred after discharge in 10 of these 14 patients. Only 8 patients (19%) stated that they were aware of the risk of dural puncture prior to their epidural, three of whom were members of paramedical professions.ConclusionsHeadache and backache are both common following dural puncture with a 16 G needle and both frequently recur after discharge from hospital. It was the strongly expressed opinion of this selected group that all mothers should be warned of the risk of dural puncture before undergoing epidural analgesia.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.