• Tomoaki Imai, Masahiro Michizawa, Gentaro Fujita, Hidetaka Shimizu, Yoshiyuki Ota, Tetsuhisa Kitamura, Hiroshi Ichiyanagi, and Tatsuro Kai.
• Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saiseikai Senri Hospital, Suita, Osaka, Japan. hsc12@hotmail.com
• J Trauma. 2011 Nov 1;71(5):1371-5.

BackgroundAnatomic reduction of the zygomatic arch, a key surgical landmark for midfacial width and projection, is essential for the treatment of combined fractures of the zygomaticomaxillary complex and zygomatic arch. Reduction control in surgery for this common facial fracture would be facilitated by intraoperative real-time assessment using widely available and reliable equipment. Although C-arm fluoroscopy is routinely used in the repair of orthopedic fractures, its use in the maxillofacial region, particularly for combined zygomatic fractures, has been scarcely reported.MethodsWe prospectively evaluated C-arm-guided reduction in 38 patients of combined zygomatic fracture without concurrent craniofacial fractures. Patients were classified according to the presence or absence of bone contact in the displaced zygomatic arch, namely as conserved (C) and loss (L) types, respectively. Reduction status was determined by the degree of recovery of the malar prominence and arch shape.ResultsIn all cases, C-arm imaging clearly displayed the displaced zygomatic arch and body in a single image. Cumulative fluoroscopic time was a few minutes in all cases. Total reduction status was excellent in 21 patients and good in 17. No case was classified as fair or poor. Repair was significantly more favorable in type C than in type L cases (p = 0.0016).ConclusionsIn combined zygomatic fractures, the C-arm technique provides easy, flexible, and time-efficient adjustment. Its comprehensive imaging for zygomatic arch shape and body contour markedly facilitates the control of fracture reduction and protects against unexpected, unsatisfactory outcomes.

23 keywords...

hide…