• Paul J Kokorowski, Jeanne S Chow, Keith J Strauss, Melanie Pennison, William Tan, Bartley Cilento, and Caleb P Nelson.
• Division of Urology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: pkokorowski@yahoo.com.
• J. Urol. 2013 Oct 1;190(4 Suppl):1474-8.

PurposeAfter prospective measurement of radiation exposure during pediatric ureteroscopy for urolithiasis, we identified targets for intervention. We sought to systematically reduce radiation exposure during pediatric ureteroscopy.Materials And MethodsWe designed and implemented a pre-fluoroscopy quality checklist for patients undergoing ureteroscopy at our institution as part of a quality improvement initiative. Preoperative patient characteristics, operative factors, fluoroscopy settings and radiation exposure were recorded. Primary outcomes were the entrance skin dose in mGy and midline dose in mGy before and after checklist implementation.ResultsWe directly observed 32 consecutive ureteroscopy procedures using the safety checklist, of which 27 were done in pediatric patients who met study inclusion criteria. Outcomes were compared to those in 37 patients from the pre-checklist phase. Pre-checklist and postchecklist groups were similar in patient age, total operative time or patient thickness. The mean entrance skin dose and midline dose were decreased by 88% and 87%, respectively (p <0.01). Significant improvements were noted among the major radiation dose determinants, total fluoroscopy time (reduced by 67%), dose rate setting (appropriately reduced dose setting in 93% vs 51%) and excess skin-to-intensifier distance (reduced by 78%, each p <0.01).ConclusionsAfter systematic evaluation of our practices and implementation of a fluoroscopy quality checklist, there were dramatic decreases in radiation doses to children during ureteroscopy.Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

30 keywords...

hide…