• Pediatrics · Mar 2008

    Comparative Study

    A simulator-based tool that assesses pediatric resident resuscitation competency.

    • Marisa B Brett-Fleegler, Robert J Vinci, Debra L Weiner, Sion Kim Harris, Mei-Chiung Shih, and Monica E Kleinman.
    • Division of Emergency Medicine, Main South Basement, Room CB0120, Children's Hospital Boston, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA. marisa.brett@childrens.harvard.edu
    • Pediatrics. 2008 Mar 1;121(3):e597-603.

    BackgroundCompetency in pediatric resuscitation is an essential goal of pediatric residency training. Both the exigencies of patient care and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education require assessment of this competency. Although there are standard courses in pediatric resuscitation, no published, validated assessment tool exists for pediatric resuscitation competency.ObjectiveThe purpose of this work was to develop a simulation-based tool for the assessment of pediatric residents' resuscitation competency and to evaluate the tool's reliability and preliminarily its validity in a pilot study.MethodsWe developed a 72-question yes-or-no questionnaire, the Tool for Resuscitation Assessment Using Computerized Simulation, representing 4 domains of resuscitation competency: basic resuscitation, airway support, circulation and arrhythmia management, and leadership behavior. We enrolled 25 subjects at each of 5 different training levels who all participated in 3 standardized code scenarios using the Laerdal SimMan universal patient simulator. Performances were videotaped and then reviewed by 2 independent expert raters.ResultsThe final version of the tool is presented. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the 2 raters ranged from 0.70 to 0.76 for the 4 domain scores and was 0.80 for the overall summary score. Between the 2 raters, the mean percent exact agreement across items in each domain ranged from 81.0% to 85.1% and averaged 82.1% across all of the items in the tool. Across subject groups, there was a trend toward increasing scores with increased training, which was statistically significant for the airway and summary scores.ConclusionsIn this pilot study, the Tool for Resuscitation Assessment Using Computerized Simulation demonstrated good interrater reliability within each domain and for summary scores. Performance analysis shows trends toward improvement with increasing years of training, providing preliminary construct validity.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.