• Gastrointest. Endosc. · Feb 2011

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Patient-controlled sedation with propofol and remifentanil for ERCP: a randomized, controlled study.

    • Maxim Mazanikov, Marianne Udd, Leena Kylänpää, Outi Lindström, Pekka Aho, Jorma Halttunen, Martti Färkkilä, and Reino Pöyhiä.
    • Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. maxim.mazanikov@hus.fi
    • Gastrointest. Endosc. 2011 Feb 1;73(2):260-6.

    BackgroundDeep sedation with propofol and an opioid is commonly used for ERCP but is associated with increased risk and may require the presence of an anesthesiologist. Delivery of propofol and a short-acting, potent opioid analgesic remifentanil by patients to themselves (patient-controlled sedation, PCS) could be another option. Comparative studies with propofol PCS for ERCP are lacking.ObjectiveTo compare PCS with propofol/remifentanil to anesthesiologist-managed propofol sedation.DesignProspective, randomized, controlled human trial.SettingUniversity hospital.PatientsThis study involved 80 patients presenting for elective ERCP.InterventionPatients were randomized to PCS with propofol/remifentanil (PCS group) or anesthesiologist-managed propofol sedation (propofol infusion group). Sedation level was estimated every 5 minutes throughout the procedure by using Ramsay and Gillham sedation scores. The total amount of propofol was calculated at the end of the procedure. Endoscopist and patient satisfaction with the procedures was evaluated with a structured questionnaire.Main Outcome MeasurementsPatient vital signs, amount of consumed propofol, sedation levels, and degree of endoscopist and patient satisfaction.ResultsPCS was successful with 38 of 40 (95%) ERCP patients. In the PCS group, the mean (±standard deviation) level of sedation was markedly lighter and propofol consumption significantly smaller (175±98 mg) than in the propofol infusion group (249±138 mg) (P<.01). Degrees of patient and endoscopist satisfaction were equally high in both groups. All of the patients preferred the same sedation method should a repeat ERCP be required.LimitationsSingle-center study.ConclusionPCS with propofol/remifentanil is a suitable and well-accepted sedation method for ERCP. Anesthesiologist-managed propofol sedation with constant propofol infusion is associated with unnecessary deep sedation without any impact on the degree of patient or endoscopist satisfaction. Further larger-scale studies are needed to assess the safety of PCS in ERCP patients. (Clinical Trial Registration NumberNCT01079312.).Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.