• Dawn A Marcus, Cheryl D Bernstein, Erin A Sullivan, and Thomas E Rudy.
• Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
• Headache. 2010 Apr 1;50(4):539-50.

ObjectiveTo prospectively evaluate the diagnosis of menstrual migraine (MM) by comparing 2 diagnostic systems.MethodsFemale migraineurs self-reporting a substantial relationship between migraine and menses were evaluated with 3 consecutive months of daily headache recording diaries. A relationship between menses and migraine was evaluated using International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-II) criteria and a probability model called Probability MM.ResultsThree months of pretreatment prospective diaries were completed by 126 women. ICHD-II menstrually related migraine was diagnosed in 73.8% with pure MM in 7.1%. ICHD-II and Probability diagnoses agreed for all cases of ICHD-II non-MM and pure MM, with disagreement among women diagnosed with ICHD-II menstrually related migraine, only half of whom were identified as having a relationship with menses greater than chance alone using the Probability model. Interestingly, 20% of those women self-reporting a substantial relationship between migraine and menses were not prospectively diagnosed with MM using either diagnostic system. Differences in menstrual vs nonmenstrual headaches were greater when using the Probability model.ConclusionsProspective headache diaries are needed to diagnose MM. A probability-based method, which considers the chance occurrence of headaches during the menstrual cycle, identifies fewer women as having menstrually related migraine compared with the diary-based methods recommended by the current ICHD-II candidate criteria.

37 keywords...

hide…