-
Review Comparative Study
An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: research questions in COPD.
- Bartolome R Celli, Marc Decramer, Jadwiga A Wedzicha, Kevin C Wilson, Alvar Agustí, Gerard J Criner, William MacNee, Barry J Make, Stephen I Rennard, Robert A Stockley, Claus Vogelmeier, Antonio Anzueto, David H Au, Peter J Barnes, Pierre-Regis Burgel, Peter M Calverley, Ciro Casanova, Enrico M Clini, Christopher B Cooper, Harvey O Coxson, Daniel J Dusser, Leonardo M Fabbri, Bonnie Fahy, Gary T Ferguson, Andrew Fisher, Monica J Fletcher, Maurice Hayot, John R Hurst, Paul W Jones, Donald A Mahler, François Maltais, David M Mannino, Fernando J Martinez, Marc Miravitlles, Paula M Meek, Alberto Papi, Klaus F Rabe, Nicolas Roche, Frank C Sciurba, Sanjay Sethi, Nikos Siafakas, Don D Sin, Joan B Soriano, James K Stoller, Donald P Tashkin, Thierry Troosters, Geert M Verleden, Johny Verschakelen, Jorgen Vestbo, John W Walsh, George R Washko, Robert A Wise, Emiel F M Wouters, Richard L ZuWallack, and ATS/ERS Task Force for COPD Research.
- Further details of this ATS/ERS Task Force for COPD Research can be found in the acknowledgements section. Project co-chairs; should be considered co-first authors.
- Eur. Respir. J. 2015 Apr 1; 45 (4): 879-905.
AbstractChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity, mortality, and resource use worldwide. The goal of this official American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) research statement is to describe evidence related to diagnosis, assessment and management; identify gaps in knowledge; and make recommendations for future research. It is not intended to provide clinical practice recommendations on COPD diagnosis and management. Clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates with expertise in COPD were invited to participate. A literature search of Medline was performed, and studies deemed relevant were selected. The search was not a systematic review of the evidence. Existing evidence was appraised and summarised, and then salient knowledge gaps were identified. Recommendations for research that addresses important gaps in the evidence in all areas of COPD were formulated via discussion and consensus. Great strides have been made in the diagnosis, assessment and management of COPD, as well as understanding its pathogenesis. Despite this, many important questions remain unanswered. This ATS/ERS research statement highlights the types of research that leading clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates believe will have the greatest impact on patient-centred outcomes. Copyright ©ATS/ERS 2015.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.