• Lisa R Jackson Pulver, Alison Bush, and Jeanette Ward.
• Indigenous Health, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW.
• Aust Health Rev. 2003 Jan 1;26(2):19-25.

ObjectivesTo determine the accuracy of routine identification of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women confining at King George V (KGV) Hospital, located in Sydney, Australia.DesignInterviewer-administered survey.ParticipantsConsecutive sample of women who delivered live, well infants from May to July 1999.Main Outcome MeasureComparison of hospital documentation compared with confidential self-disclosure of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander status to a female Aboriginal health professional.ResultsOf 536 women in our sample, 29 (5%) self-disclosed as being Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. Only 10 of these were identified as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander in hospital records (p<0.001). While specificity as determined by us was 100%, sensitivity was low (34.5%). Those Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women referred by another organisation were significantly more likely than those who self-referred to the hospital to be correctly identified (p=0.011). Only 1% of non-Aboriginal women indicated they would have objected to an explicit question by staff about their Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander status.ConclusionsRoutine identification significantly under-represents Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander women giving birth at an urban obstetric hospital. We recommend the development and use of a sensitive but also specific series of questions to ensure women always are given the opportunity to disclose their status, especially as few women appear to mind such questions.

20 keywords...

hide…