• Catheter Cardiovasc Interv · Feb 2013

    Multicenter Study Comparative Study

    Impact of aortic valve calcification on the outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: results from the prospective multicenter German TAVI registry.

    • Stephan Staubach, Jennifer Franke, Ulrich Gerckens, Gerhard Schuler, Ralf Zahn, Holger Eggebrecht, Rainer Hambrecht, Stefan Sack, Gert Richardt, Martin Horack, Jochen Senges, Daniel H Steinberg, Jakob Ledwoch, Stephan Fichtlscherer, Mirko Doss, Nina Wunderlich, Horst Sievert, and German Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation-Registry Investigators.
    • CardioVascular Center Frankfurt, Sankt Katharinen und Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany. stephanstaubach@gmail.com
    • Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb 1;81(2):348-55.

    ObjectivesTranscatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an emerging technology in patients with severe aortic stenosis.BackgroundWhether the degree of aortic valve calcification impacts the outcome after TAVI has not been thoroughly evaluated.MethodsWe analyzed data from the prospective multicenter German TAVI registry, including 1,365 patients as of July 2010. Patients were divided into three groups, based on the degree of aortic valve calcification: mild (n = 67), moderate (n = 392), and severe (n = 906) valve calcification, determined by visual estimation by the operator.ResultsMean age was 81.7 ± 6.2 years; mean logistic EUROscore was 20.6 ± 13.7%. Patients with severe aortic valve calcification had a higher mean and peak-to-peak gradient before the intervention (P < 0.0001). Technical success was achieved in 97%, similar in each group. The Medtronic CoreValve was implanted in 80.8%, the Sapien Edwards prosthesis in the remaining cases. The duration of the procedure and fluoroscopy was higher in the group with severe calcification (P < 0.01 for procedure and P < 0.05 for fluoroscopy). During the periprocedural period there were no differences among the groups regarding in-hospital death, cerebrovascular events, myocardial infarction, thromboembolic events, aortic dissection, or severe vascular complications. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in postprocedural aortic mean gradient (7.0 mm Hg vs. 5.6 mm Hg vs. 6.3 mm Hg; P = 0.07), in residual aortic regurgitation (74% vs. 72% vs. 68%; P = 0.3) or postprocedure pacemaker implantation (38% vs. 30.4% vs. 34.2%; P = 0.35). During 30-day follow up there was no difference in regard to the number of death, strokes, and myocardial infarctions.ConclusionsOur results of a real-world registry suggest that the extent of aortic valve calcification does not influence the success or procedural outcome significantly.Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.