• Ruth Endacott, Julie Scholes, Simon Cooper, Tracy McConnell-Henry, Jo Porter, Karen Missen, Leigh Kinsman, and Robert Champion.
• Faculty of Health, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK. ruth.endacott@plymouth.ac.uk
• Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Jun 1;49(6):710-7.

ObjectivesThe study aim was to examine how Registered Nurses identify and respond to deteriorating patients during in-hospital simulation exercises.DesignMixed methods study using simulated actors.SettingA rural hospital in Victoria, Australia.ParticipantsThirty-four Registered Nurses each completed two simulation exercises.MethodsData were obtained from the following sources: (a) Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) rating to assess performance of Registered Nurses during two simulation exercises (chest pain and respiratory distress); (b) video footage of the simulation exercises; (c) reflective interview during participants' review of video footage. Qualitative thematic analysis of video and interview data was undertaken.ResultsThemes generated from the data were: (1) exhausting autonomous decision-making; (2) misinterpreting the evidence; (3) conditioned response; and (4) missed cues. Assessment steps were more likely to be omitted in the chest pain simulation, for which there was a hospital protocol in place.ConclusionsVideo review revealed additional insights into nurses' decision-making that were not evident from OSCE scoring alone. Feedback during video review was a highly valued component of the simulation exercises.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

6 keywords...

hide…