• Marc-David Munk, Lynne Fullerton, Laura Banks, Sarah Morley, Robert McDaniels, Stuart Castle, Kyle Thornton, and Michael E Richards.
• Department of Emergency Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
• Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012 Oct 1;27(5):452-7.

IntroductionFew emergency medical services (EMS) interventions in New Mexico have been assessed for efficacy, potential harm, or potential benefit. There is concern that many interventions added over the years may be outdated, harmful, or ineffective in the EMS setting. A formal process for reviewing the state EMS scope of practice using literature review and expert consensus is discussed. In Phase One of the project, interventions in the New Mexico EMS scope of practice were prioritized for further review by surveying a national cadre of EMS experts to evaluate EMS interventions using a utilitarian harm/benefit metric.MethodsAn electronic survey based on the 2010 New Mexico EMS Scope of Practice statute was administered from March through June, 2011. A national cadre of 104 respondents was identified. Respondents were either State EMS medical directors or EMS fellowship directors. Respondents were asked to rate the potential harm and the potential benefit of specific EMS interventions on a 5-point ordinal scale. Median harm and benefit scores were calculated.ResultsA total of 88 completed surveys were received following 208 emailed invitations to 104 respondents (43% response rate). Twenty-two (22) highest-priority interventions (those with a harm/benefit median score ratio of >1) were identified. Seven additional second-priority interventions were also identified. These interventions will be advanced for formal literature review and expert consensus.ConclusionsThe New Mexico EMS Interventions Project offers a novel model for assessing a prehospital scope of practice.

10 keywords...

hide…