-
Critical care medicine · Oct 2012
Quality improvement and cost savings after implementation of the Leapfrog intensive care unit physician staffing standard at a community teaching hospital.
- Amay Parikh, Shirley A Huang, Praveen Murthy, Viktor Dombrovskiy, Michael Nolledo, Ray Lefton, and Anthony T Scardella.
- UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. amayparikh@gmail.com
- Crit. Care Med.. 2012 Oct 1;40(10):2754-9.
BackgroundPrior studies have shown that implementation of the Leapfrog intensive care unit physician staffing standard of dedicated intensivists providing 24-hr intensive care unit coverage reduces length of stay and in-hospital mortality. A theoretical model of the cost-effectiveness of intensive care unit physician staffing patterns has also been published, but no study has examined the actual cost vs. cost savings of such a program.ObjectiveTo determine whether improved outcomes in specific quality measures would result in an overall cost savings in patient careDesignRetrospective, 1 yr before-after cohort studySettingA 15-bed mixed medical-surgical community intensive care unitPatientsA total of 2,181 patients: 1,113 patients preimplementation and 1,068 patients postimplementation.InterventionLeapfrog intensive care unit physician staffing standardMeasurementsIntensive care unit and hospital length of stay, rates for ventilator-associated pneumonia and central venous access device infection, and cost of care.ResultsFollowing institution of the intensive care unit physician staffing, the mean intensive care unit length of stay decreased significantly from 3.5±8.9 days to 2.7±4.7 days, (p<.002). The frequency of ventilator-associated pneumonia fell from 8.1% to 1.3% (p<.0002) after intervention. Ventilator-associated pneumonia rate per 100 ventilator days decreased from 1.03 to 0.38 (p<.0002). After intervention, the frequency of the central venous access device infection events fell from 9.4% to 1.1% (p<.0002). Central venous access device infection rate per 1000 line days decreased from 8.49 to 1.69. The net savings for the hospital were $744,001. The 1-yr institutional return on investment from intensive care unit physician staffing was 105%.ConclusionsImplementation of the Leapfrog intensive care unit physician staffing standard significantly reduced intensive care unit length of stay and lowered the prevalence of ventilator-associated pneumonia and central venous access device infection. A cost analysis yielded a 1-yr institutional return on investment of 105%. Our study confirms that implementation of the Leapfrog intensive care unit physician staffing model in the community hospital setting improves quality measures and is economically feasible.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.