• M Gausche, R J Lewis, S J Stratton, B E Haynes, C S Gunter, S M Goodrich, P D Poore, M D McCollough, D P Henderson, F D Pratt, and J S Seidel.
• Department of Emergency Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, and Harbor-UCLA Research and Education Institute, Torrance, Calif 90509, USA. mgausche@emedharbor.edu
• JAMA. 2000 Feb 9;283(6):783-90.

ContextEndotracheal intubation (ETI) is widely used for airway management of children in the out-of-hospital setting, despite a lack of controlled trials demonstrating a positive effect on survival or neurological outcome.ObjectiveTo compare the survival and neurological outcomes of pediatric patients treated with bag-valve-mask ventilation (BVM) with those of patients treated with BVM followed by ETI.DesignControlled clinical trial, in which patients were assigned to interventions by calendar day from March 15, 1994, through January 1, 1997.SettingTwo large, urban, rapid-transport emergency medical services (EMS) systems.ParticipantsA total of 830 consecutive patients aged 12 years or younger or estimated to weigh less than 40 kg who required airway management; 820 were available for follow-up.InterventionsPatients were assigned to receive either BVM (odd days; n = 410) or BVM followed by ETI (even days; n = 420).Main Outcome MeasuresSurvival to hospital discharge and neurological status at discharge from an acute care hospital compared by treatment group.ResultsThere was no significant difference in survival between the BVM group (123/404 [30%]) and the ETI group (110/416 [26%]) (odds ratio [OR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-1.11) or in the rate of achieving a good neurological outcome (BVM, 92/404 [23%] vs ETI, 85/416 [20%]) (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.62-1.22).ConclusionThese results indicate that the addition of out-of-hospital ETI to a paramedic scope of practice that already includes BVM did not improve survival or neurological outcome of pediatric patients treated in an urban EMS system.

18 keywords...

hide…