• Linda S Barter, Laurie O Mark, Steven L Jinks, Earl E Carstens, and Joseph F Antognini.
• Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California, Davis, California, USA. lsbarter@ucdavis.edu
• Anesth. Analg. 2008 Mar 1;106(3):985-90, table of contents.

BackgroundThe spinal cord is an important site where volatile anesthetics decrease sensation and produce immobility. Beyond this knowledge, our understanding of a site of anesthetic action is limited. Previous evidence suggests that dorsal horn neurons with ascending projections may be more susceptible to depression by general anesthetics than local spinal interneurons. In this study we evaluated the effects of volatile and injectable general anesthetics on lumbar dorsal horn neurons with and without ascending projections.MethodsThirty-seven adult male rats underwent laminectomies at C1, for placement of a stimulating electrode, and T13/L1, for extracellular recording from the spinal cord dorsal horn. Neuronal responses to heat were evaluated under two doses of halothane, isoflurane, or propofol anesthesia.ResultsUnder both halothane and isoflurane anesthesia, increasing the dose from 0.8 to 1.2 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) had no significant effect on heat-evoked responses in neurons that had ascending projections identified via antidromic stimulation (AD) or those without ascending projections (nAD). Heat responses in AD neurons 1 min after i.v. administration of 3 and 5 mg/kg of propofol were reduced to 60% +/- 18% (mean +/- SE) and 39% +/- 14% of control respectively. Similarly, in nAD neurons responses were reduced to 56% +/- 14% and 50% +/- 10% of control by 3 and 5 mg/kg propofol respectively.ConclusionsOur findings suggest, at peri-MAC concentrations, these general anesthetics do not preferentially depress lumbar dorsal horn neurons with ascending projections compared to those with no identifiable ascending projections.

31 keywords...

hide…